Statement of Claim
LiveA complete, review-ready pleading - causes, elements, evidence, and relief. You decide whether to file.
Start with your caseWhat it is
The statement of claim is ORCA's core output: from your case narrative, the system identifies the relevant causes of action, builds the legal elements of each, and maps every assertion to supporting evidence.
The result is a document in proper legal Hebrew, in the structure the court expects: a draft ready for your review and signature, and not a replacement for professional judgment.
What the document includes
- Caption and party details, territorial and subject-matter jurisdiction
- Causes of action with the legal elements of each
- An ordered facts section, every assertion mapped to evidence
- Requested relief and an exhibit list
Sample excerpt
In the Magistrate Court of Tel Aviv–Jaffa
Plaintiff: Dr. Michal Cohen, ID No. XXXXX, dermatologist, of 18 Sokolov St., Ramat Gan
Defendant: Alon Barak, ID No. XXXXX, of 42 Weizmann St., Tel Aviv
Cause of action: Online defamation with intent to harm (Defamation Law, 1965, §7א(ג))
On 15.1.2026 the Plaintiff provided the Defendant with laser treatment at her clinic, pursuant to a signed informed-consent form detailing the expected side effects (Exhibit 2). On 18.1.2026 the Defendant published a post on his open Facebook profile calling the Plaintiff a "dangerous doctor" and attributing to her "burning my face" - despite his knowledge of those very side effects he had signed for.
Within 48 hours the first post drew 847 likes, 312 shares, and 189 comments. On 20.1.2026 the Plaintiff messaged the Defendant privately and explained that the redness is an expected, transient side effect. Just two days later, on 22.1.2026, the Defendant escalated and published a second post attributing "medical fraud" to the Plaintiff.
The deliberate escalation after the explicit explanation establishes the intent-to-harm element under §7א(ג). Following the publications, 8 patients cancelled their appointments within 72 hours of each post - a direct, documented income loss of ₪12,000 (Exhibit 6), alongside reputational harm to a professional standing built over 14 years. Total claim: ₪212,000.
Relief sought: The Court is requested to order the Defendant to pay statutory damages of ₪100,000 for each of the two publications under §7א(ג) of the Defamation Law, documented income loss of ₪12,000, and a correction-or-retraction order at his expense under §9(א)(2) - ₪212,000 in total, together with linkage differentials, statutory interest, and court costs.
Every document is built from the facts of your case, not a generic template.
Start with your case