It drafts your statement of claim. And checks it like a litigator.
ORCA is a legal-analysis system for Israeli civil litigation. It takes a case apart into its legal components -- causes, elements, evidence, relief -- and the documents it produces (a Statement of Claim, a Strategy Memo) are the outputs of that one analysis: consistent with each other in law and in logic, not written independently from a template.
Which facts anchor each cause, which exhibits are missing - and where opposing counsel will find the gap.
And when the case isn't ready, ORCA says so instead of approving it for filing.
Built for solo litigators and mid-market firms running real civil cases. Not legal-tech demos, not enterprise pilots.
Early access, free • no subscription • no commitment
A graphic diagram demonstrating the structure of the statement of claim ORCA produces; no real content shown.
True. Complete. Transparent.
Every automated check is proven able to catch the error it exists for before we rely on it -- and every draft is checked independently of the model that wrote it.
True
Every fact, amount, and citation in the draft traces back to your case file and is verified against it. Unsourced content is blocked, not flagged.
Complete
Every required section is present and internally consistent - parties, facts, causes, relief, exhibits - before the draft reaches you.
Transparent
Every weakness we find in your case is stated plainly in the strategy memo. When the case isn't ready, the memo says so - it does not dress a weak case up as a strong one.
More than 200 automated checks run on every draft before you see it.
Every document goes through these validation tests:
- Presence of every legal element for each cause
- Internal consistency between facts and causes
- Completeness of relief specification
- Evidence mapping for every claim
- Absence of contradictions between document parts
If a check fails - the document is flagged. The lawyer sees what failed and why, before deciding whether to proceed.
Every document ships with a professional report naming which parts passed automated verification and which call for your judgment; when a substantive check fails, ORCA declines to certify the document and explains what is blocking and why.
Your client's file is handled with the care privileged material demands
Before a lawyer sends us a case file, the privacy question has to already be answered. Here is the answer, in one place:
Complete case isolation
No data is shared between cases, between clients, or between firms. Each firm sees only its own documents.
Encrypted, stored in Israel
Encrypted in transit (TLS) and at rest; application data - case files, exhibits, generated documents - is stored on servers in Israel.
Deleted automatically
Case content is removed within 30 days of the last activity on the case, uploaded files sooner. No request needed.
Never used for AI training
Generation runs through OpenAI and Anthropic under API terms that exclude training. Your client's materials never teach anyone's model.
ORCA isn't here to replace the lawyer. It's here to replace the hours they waste on work they already know how to do.
An experienced attorney who receives a new case sees the causes of action, the odds, and the available relief almost immediately. But between that judgment and a filed statement of claim lies the drafting cycle: drafting facts, organizing exhibits, calculating relief, editing, proofreading, more proofreading. ORCA handles that part.
Every litigator's real fear isn't the writing hours - it's filing with a hole you didn't see. ORCA doesn't just draft - it checks: which facts anchor each cause, which exhibits are missing, and where the gaps are that opposing counsel will exploit. Automated quality gates. A document that doesn't meet the threshold - blocked. ORCA doesn't fabricate facts, doesn't cite non-existent case law, and doesn't produce generic boilerplate.
What lands on the lawyer's desk is a professional draft that requires review and judgment - not a rewrite from scratch. The legal judgment remains yours. The technical working hours - no longer.
Every output passes more than 200 automated checks before it reaches you. The number matters less than the kind: targeted checks a language model alone would never catch:
Two documents. One run.
Civil Statement of Claim
A document ready for attorney review, including a caption, detailed facts, causes of action with full elements analysis, calculated relief, exhibit list, and evidence map. Not a fill-in template - a document written for your specific case, based on the facts you entered.
Strategy Memo
An internal document that is not filed in court. It details which causes were selected and why, which were rejected, what the anticipated defenses are, the realistic settlement range, and the case's vulnerabilities. The document an experienced attorney builds mentally before starting to write.
How it works
Tell us what happened
Free text. ORCA asks what's missing.
ORCA does the work
Causes. Elements. Relief. Evidence - mapped end to end.
Review, sign, file
Ten sections in legal Hebrew, ready for your review. We email you a download link when it's ready.
Who is this for?
ORCA is built for lawyers running civil litigation. Not legal-tech demos, not enterprise pilots.
The solo litigator
You draft the pleadings yourself and want a second pair of eyes confirming every cause holds before filing.
The boutique or mid-size firm
As caseload grows, drafting quality has to stay uniform. The same professional standard on every case, and across every lawyer in the firm.
Stepping into a new area
The case falls in a less-familiar area, and you get the map of causes, elements, and evidence up front, before drafting even starts.
ORCA surfaces the problem instead of smoothing it over
Transparency matters to us. Here is what ORCA surfaces rather than hides:
- Output is a reviewed draft - your job is final review and filing, not rewriting from scratch
- Professional judgment stays with you - ORCA handles the technical drafting
- Does not release documents that fail quality checks. There is no 'maybe good enough' state.
Not covered
- Criminal, family, administrative, and rabbinical courts
ORCA writes high-quality drafts. You decide, edit, and sign.
Questions we're asked
Won't this replace me?
No. ORCA writes drafts. It doesn't know how to look a client in the eye, negotiate a settlement, or sit through a hearing.
What about client confidentiality?
Encrypted. Case data stored in Israel. AI processing via OpenAI/Anthropic under their standard API terms, not used for training. Auto-deleted 30 days after the last activity on the case.
How do I know the causes are legally correct?
Every cause ORCA selects is built on a fixed, validated list of legal elements under Israeli law - with a specific statutory anchor for each element. Before selecting any cause, the system checks that the facts you provided are sufficient to establish each element. If an element can't be established - ORCA flags the gap instead of filling it with plausible-sounding text. The legal knowledge base for each domain was authored by a licensed Israeli litigator with civil litigation experience.
What if there's a mistake?
There will be mistakes. That's why it's a draft and why you're a lawyer. You review, correct, and sign.
Is it permissible for a lawyer to use AI for drafting?
Yes. ORCA produces a draft. Professional responsibility for reviewing, editing, and signing rests with the attorney, per Israel Bar Association rules. ORCA does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.
What's the difference between ORCA and a general AI assistant?
A general AI assistant doesn't know what it doesn't know. ORCA validates its legal knowledge before drafting - checking that each cause it selects includes the correct elements, the correct statutory anchors, and no contradictions with other causes. If the knowledge isn't there - ORCA flags the gap instead of filling it with text that sounds plausible.
What about malpractice liability? Who's responsible if there's an error?
The attorney. ORCA generates a draft - a work tool, not a final document. The attorney reviews, edits, and signs. Professional responsibility is theirs, exactly as with any other work tool. ORCA does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Our Terms of Service detail the allocation of responsibility.
We don't promise "filing-ready." Even a document that passed all checks requires attorney review. ORCA produces the draft - not the final judgment.
No case law cited in the document body. No invented facts. No hidden failures - every failed check is reported explicitly.
A legal-knowledge layer spanning dozens of civil-law areas. See all domains →
Drafted to a partner's review standard. Checked before it reaches you.
See what ORCA produces with your facts.
Not a demo. Not a simulation. Your case, your facts, a real draft.
Your first draft will tell you more than any marketing page: one case, one hour of review.
Try now - early access, freeCase data is stored on a secured server in Israel and automatically deleted 30 days after the last activity on the case, and is never used for any purpose other than processing your case.
Built by Adv. Moran Bickel, a litigator, because only someone who has drafted thousands of pleadings knows what can truly be automated, and what must never be touched.